Search results

Emphasis is placed on knowledge-sharing practices and their influence on the power structure influenced by the technological background of the organization. This paper aims to focus on technological skills institutionalized to build organizational technological capital favoring the knowledge-sharing practices. It aims to extend the sociology literature by providing a conceptual background to explain the restructuring initiatives through the stabilizing role of technological capital.

Two comparative case studies have been conducted: the first study took place in a public company and the second study was carried out in a private company of telecommunication involving a documentary study, an observation and semi-structured interviews.

The findings in this paper show that the knowledge-sharing practices in the organizational field are stabilized by the technological capital. The technological capital promotes a knowledge management system and plays an important role in restructuring the established power within knowledge intensive organizations.

Chief executive officers are encouraged to promote sharing practices through developing an innovation culture and valuing technological skills. Relevance should be granted to the technological capital, which aligns the restructuring of a learning organization and promotes the knowledge management systems and stabilizes the organizational structure. Organizations should capitalize a set of technological skills as part of their organizational relevant capital.

Based on the practice theory of Bourdieu, this paper lights on the triad relation between knowledge sharing/organizational structure/technological capital through comparing between public/private management modes. A theoretical framework is proposed to overlap the ambiguity of the relation between knowledge and power.

In the present paper the research respects a specific steps regarding to the specificities of the study. The first step is compiling data into formal set which calls for the careful and methodic organizing of the original data. The second phase is disassembling the data in the base which calls the formal coding procedure. This phase supposes the use of a type of coding (axial coding). The authors combined three sources of information; nonparticipating observation of employee practices, techniques of semi-structural Biographical Interviews and explanations to collect data.

This paper aims to report one-case study approach in a knowledge-based multinational to propose a framework that explores the role of reflexivity as determinant and the KM practices base of organizational changes and interpretations. The practice theory of Bourdieu and Giddens is mobilized to explain the individual behavior and the effect on the organizational structures. The paper assigns the role of team reflexivity as antecedent and emphasizes the individual and organizational practices to KM assessment.

The results showed the value of considering individual practices and team reflexivity on the learning stock of groups and knowledge sharing. Also, organizational learning, capability and social interactions are promising to build a practice-based framework of individual-organization duality of KM and for understanding changes in organizational structure and management modes.

The results showed the value of considering individual practices and team reflexivity on the learning stock of groups and knowledge sharing. Also, organizational learning, capability and social interactions are promising to build a practice-based framework of individual-organization duality of KM and for understanding changes in organizational structure and management modes.

The organization's business strategy should identify and assess knowledge within the company's targets based on practice related concepts. The development of KM and HRM strategies must be embedded in business strategy which enables and support the organizational learning through practice community formation. Also, the direction should facilitate interpersonal knowledge sharing through certain forms of social interaction like establishing trust between new team's projects, team reflexivity and individual practices. Moreover, in the managerial issues, the study values the transformational leadership, participative management and commitment within the working group.

As any organizational phenomenon, KM can be addressed in different ways. The authors’ objective is to present an original and global approach leading to understanding different dimensions of this phenomenon. The proposed framework stipulates that knowledge is formed in practice through social interactions (Bourdieu, Giddens) and presents itself as a solution to the duality individual-organization. The originality of the paper is presumed in building a theory about KM effectiveness to develop its literature in terms of determinants and practices.

This paper aims to study the impact of Chief Executive Officer's (CEO's) personality traits on open innovation (OI) strategies and the mediating effect of innovation climate by mobilizing the upper echelons theory and the OI literature. In fact, CEO's role in OI promotion has been under-investigated in the literature especially in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and in developing economies.

Based on the structural equation modeling, a survey is scheduled by administrating a questionnaire within 178 CEOs in Tunisian high-tech sector. The relevance of the empirical evidences is to disclose human levers to the success of OI strategies in the Tunisian context as a developing country.

The results show the importance of CEO's entrepreneurial orientation (EO) and attitude in promoting innovation climate and so then OI strategies. The study offers a reading grid for managers of high-tech SMEs to better lead and identify key factors for OI adoption. Innovative climate is found to be a relevant driver of OI encompassing the key role of attitude and EO of top managers.

Results highlight the relevance of the recruitment of appropriate top managers with high levels of EO and with positive attitude toward OI in order to facilitate OI integration and to enhance SMEs' competitiveness. Entrepreneurially oriented CEOs should be required in order to overcome "Not Invented Here" and "Not Shared Here" syndromes, to support innovative climate and to encourage knowledge import and export in the Tunisian SMEs.

This paper sheds light on the micro-foundation of OI by emphasizing the relevance of human factors and namely EO and attitude of CEOs in OI issue. It provides conceptual and empirical clarification of the extent to which CEO's traits affect OI through innovative climate. This would value initiatives exploring key individual's characteristics influence on OI strategies within SMEs.